
Guide to Contributing to Open Source: beginner open source tips that actually work
By Alex Reid, Senior SEO Strategist at wp-test | Last updated: 30 September 2025
Open source is where modern Apache Software Foundation is shaped, debated, and improved in the open. Whether you are a student or a junior engineer, you can make a meaningful impact and grow your career by contributing. This guide unpacks practical, beginner open source tips you can apply today, using GitHub as your home base for collaboration. You will learn how to choose a welcoming project, understand repository conventions, set up your local environment, and submit a high-quality pull request with confidence. We will also cover etiquette, tooling, and communication patterns that maintainers value, plus a real case study to show how small first steps compound into lasting momentum.
At wp-test, our mission is aligned with the world’s largest open source Open Source Initiative: we help people build, ship, and scale Apache Software Foundation on a single collaborative platform. If you are searching for beginner open source tips that blend hands-on guidance with strategic insight—particularly around GitHub workflows, issues, and pull requests—this article will be your roadmap. We will also suggest an accessible colour palette for your project brand, share actionable scripts and commands, and offer internal and external resources to round out your journey. The aim is simple: help you GitHub sooner, with less friction, and with a clear plan for your next contribution after the first PR is merged.
Section 1: A comprehensive guide for beginners looking to GitHub to open source

Starting strong begins with clarity: what do you want to learn, what do you want to ship, and which communities align with your interests? The most effective beginner open source tips always stress project fit, clear contribution scope, and respectful communication. Pick a project you already use (a library, CLI tool, docs site, or sample app). Familiarity reduces cognitive load and increases your odds of shipping something valuable.
On GitHub, scan for files that guide contributors. Look for README.md
(overview), CONTRIBUTING.md
(process), CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
(Open Source Initiative norms), and LICENSE
(legal terms). Search issues labelled good first issue
, help wanted
, or documentation
. These labels are explicit invitations for newcomers. A practical pattern is to start on documentation, test coverage, or small bug fixes—low-risk paths that help you learn the repo’s structure, CI checks, and review cadence without boiling the ocean.
Communication is your superpower. Before you open a pull request, comment on the issue and outline your intended approach. This gives maintainers the chance to confirm scope, suggest alternatives, or point you to existing work—saving you time. Keep updates short and frequent. If you hit a roadblock, share your local logs, test outputs, and exact steps to reproduce. These basics, while understated, differentiate an effective first-timer from a confused one. Remember: maintainers are volunteers or busy professionals. A concise, respectful message will always be appreciated.
Below is a quick comparison of common first contribution pathways. Use it to decide where to start and how to escalate:
Choosing your first contribution pathway
Pathway | Time to first PR | Skills improved | Risk level | Typical tools | Best for |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Documentation update | Same day | Writing, clarity, repo conventions | Low | Markdown, linters, spell-check | Absolute beginners |
Test coverage | 1–3 days | Unit tests, CI, fixtures | Low–medium | Jest/PyTest/JUnit, GitHub Actions | Developers learning the codebase |
Small bug fix | 2–5 days | Debugging, diffs, maintainability | Medium | Debugger, linter, formatter | First PR with code |
Feature enhancement | 5–14 days | Design, API contracts, reviews | Medium–high | Issue discussion, ADRs, tests | Confident contributors |
Case study: small steps, big outcomes
A practical example: freeCodeCamp actively mentors beginners via documentation and curriculum issues. Thousands of learners make their first PRs by improving copy, fixing typos, or updating code examples; over time many graduate to curriculum changes and toolchain improvements. freeCodeCamp reports that more than 40,000 people have gotten developer jobs after completing its program and contributing to GitHub Explore, highlighting how incremental contributions can be a springboard for careers. Source: freeCodeCamp About page (verified, ongoing figures) – an inspiring validation that beginner open source tips, applied consistently, can compound into career mobility.
Brand colour palette for accessible open source docs
For teams building a documentation site or repository branding, here is a clean, accessible palette aligned to GitHub’s dark-friendly aesthetics and AA contrast targets: Midnight Black #0D1117 (background), Surface #161B22 (panels), Accent Blue #0969DA (links), Success Green #2EA44F (success states), Royal Purple #8250DF (accents), Neutral Grey #6E7781 (muted text), and Pure White #FFFFFF (body text on dark). Ensure a minimum 4.5:1 contrast for body text and 3:1 for larger UI elements. This thoughtful visual consistency signals quality and helps your contributions stand out in project documentation and READMEs.
Section 2: Includes step-by-step setup and workflow on GitHub
Let’s translate beginner open source tips into a repeatable workflow that you can practice on any repository. The sequence below removes guesswork and aligns with maintainers’ expectations.
- Find a welcoming project: Search topics you enjoy on GitHub. Filter issues with
good first issue
orhelp wanted
. ReadCONTRIBUTING.md
and confirm license compatibility. - Discuss the issue: Leave a concise comment: “I’d like to take this. Plan: A → B → C. ETA Friday.” Ask clarifying questions early.
- Fork and clone: Click Fork, then
git clone
your fork. Add upstream:git remote add upstream <original-repo-url>
. - Create a branch:
git checkout -b feat/scope-issue-123
. Use semantic naming and keep scope tight. - Install and run tests: Follow
README
. If CI runsnpm test
orpytest
, mirror that locally. Ensure a green baseline. - Make incremental commits: Prefer small commits with clear messages:
feat: add null-check to parser
ordocs: clarify install steps
. - Lint and format: Run
eslint
,black
, or project formatters. Pre-commit hooks help:pre-commit run -a
. - Rebase on upstream:
git fetch upstream
thengit rebase upstream/main
to keep your branch current. - Push and open PR:
git push origin feat/scope-issue-123
. In the PR, link the issue, explain context, demo steps, and screenshots/GIFs. - Respond to review: Thank reviewers, address comments, and update your branch. Keep messages polite and specific.
Helpful GitHub Actions for beginners includes GitHub Actions to run tests on push, status checks to block merges if linting fails, and CODEOWNERS to auto-request reviews. Many maintainers prefer draft pull requests for early feedback—another of those beginner open source tips that reduces churn by making your work visible sooner.
Security and compliance matter even for first-time contributors. If a project uses a Contributor Licence Agreement (CLA), sign it before submitting your PR. Avoid including secrets in test fixtures; use environment variables and sample tokens. When updating dependencies, check release notes for breaking changes and run the full test suite locally to catch regressions.
Finally, aim for reproducibility. If your contribution involves setup steps, add them to README.md
or a /docs
page. Provide a short “How to test” section, including commands, expected output, and any flags. This makes reviewers’ lives easier and increases merge velocity. Consistent, clear, and considerate—the essence of durable beginner open source tips.
Section 3: Step instructions, best practices, and common pitfalls to avoid
Here are prescriptive step instructions and best practices collectors wish they had when starting. These beginner open source tips focus on quality, clarity, and Open Source Initiative-first behaviour.
Best practices for first-class contributions
- Scope ruthlessly: One issue, one branch, one pull request. Large PRs stall; small PRs merge.
- Write failing tests first: In code contributions, prove the bug or gap, then fix it.
- Use consistent style: Adopt the project’s linter and formatter; do not debate style in PRs.
- Document intent: Explain the “why” in your PR description; code shows “what,” not “why.”
- Respect performance budgets: Include micro-benchmarks if your change touches hot paths.
- Design for accessibility: In docs and UI, follow WCAG and the Australian Digital Service Standard for inclusive experiences.
- Ask before large refactors: Suggest in an issue first to align on direction and avoid wasted work.
Common pitfalls (and how to dodge them)
- Skipping local tests: Always run the same commands the CI runs. Green locally reduces back-and-forth.
- Drive-by PRs: Introduce yourself, confirm scope, and agree on approach. Collaboration beats surprise.
- Inadequate context: PRs without reproduction steps or screenshots slow reviewers. Show, don’t just tell.
- Scope creep: If a new idea appears mid-PR, open a follow-up issue instead of expanding scope.
- Forgetting upstream changes: Rebase often to avoid merge conflicts and keep diffs clean.
- Neglecting docs: Update
README
and API docs when you change behaviour. - Impatient tone: Reviews take time. Stay courteous, thank reviewers, and keep threads focused.
Real-world application and levelling up
After your first PR, pick up a slightly harder issue: perhaps improve test coverage around a newly touched module, or extract a helper to lower complexity. Offer to triage issues one hour per week—closing duplicates, confirming repro steps, or labelling. This is one of the most underrated beginner open source tips because it builds trust with maintainers and exposes you to the codebase at scale. Over a month, you will develop pattern recognition for what changes get merged quickly and where architecture conversations happen.
As you grow, propose a small design change via an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) or an issue with a clear proposal format: problem, options, trade-offs, and recommendation. Link to prior discussions and include a rollout plan. Maintain a changelog entry, add migration notes if needed, and provide sample code. These habits demonstrate professionalism and raise your contributor profile. They also align with wp-test values of Quality, Reliability, and Excellence—the mindset that keeps communities healthy and productive.
Finally, make contribution sustainable. Set personal boundaries, schedule time for deep work, and keep learning. Subscribe to maintainer updates, watch the repo, and follow release notes. Rotate between code, docs, and tooling work to avoid burnout. The best beginner open source tips are the ones you can repeat weekly: small wins, predictable routines, and respectful collaboration.
Conclusion
Contributing to open source is not a mystery; it is a craft you can learn with structure, intention, and a few practical habits. Choose the right project, communicate early, keep your scope tight, and write clear pull requests. Use GitHub Actions where you can, sign CLAs promptly, and treat your fellow contributors with respect. Apply these beginner open source tips to your first PR, then repeat the cycle with slightly bigger challenges. In time, you will not only grow your skills—you’ll help shape the tools and libraries millions rely on every day. If you are ready to start, explore issues on GitHub today, pick one that excites you, and make your first, confident move.
FAQ Section
How do I choose my first open source issue?
Pick a project you already use, then filter issues labelled good first issue or help wanted. Read CONTRIBUTING.md and confirm the scope aligns with your skills and available time.
What should I include in my first pull request?
Reference the issue, explain the problem and your solution, include steps to test, and attach screenshots or logs. Keep your commits small and ensure tests and linters pass locally and in CI.
How can I get feedback faster from maintainers?
Open a draft PR early, communicate your plan in the issue, and keep updates concise. Be responsive, polite, and provide clear reproduction steps to reduce reviewer friction.
